#3 Fair Treatment of Clones

 Panel Disucussion 3

Topic : Fair Treatment of Clones🎭

Discussion members

・Nancy Berry / buyer in fashion industry

・Ghosn Zoo / toilet cleaner

・Erinn Gray / fruiterer

・Sophia Harris / announcer

・Maggie Levitt / bank clerk

・Kaitlyn McFly Kim / car designer

Contents

① Making New Rules for Clones Just in Case

〈Erinn〉

She agrees with this idea because she has been confused by clone humans.

When she worked as a fruiterer, she told the customer who came the day before, he was actually a clone. So, he didn't come her shop. Therefore, she wants to avoid making customers uncomfortable again.

〈Sophia Harris〉

She agrees with this idea because clone humans have the same fingerprints as humans, and the fingerprint authentication system does not work either.

〈Kaitlyn〉

She also agrees with this idea. She worries that the same components parts of their body could be caused some criminals. So, she wants to make a rule to separate the natural human and the cloned human. 

〈Maggie〉

She agrees with this idea because she worries crimes that clone humans will abuse real humans to commit crimes and to prevent misuse of having the same body.

〈Ghosn〉

He is an only opponent of this topic. His opinion is strange to worry that only cloned humans will commit crimes. It's vice verce.

They moved the agenda to:

② Making New Rules to Disting from People to Cloned Human

On this topic, everyone in the group was maybe in favor of creating rules to distinguish them. 

Questions From the Audience

1. You say that cloned human commit a crime, but what exactly is it being abused??（Peter)

→ Zoo answers a cloned human can impersonate a real human and make an alibi.

2. Isn't crime raw enough?（Peter）

→ Kaitlyn answers we can distinguish clone and not clone because they have microchips in their body.

3.  What is a benefit of existing cloned human? (Bell)

→ Kaitlyn answes that it is useful to do organ transportation.

4. If they were made for organ transportation, it's strange that they live a normal life.  (Rose)

→ Kaitlyn answers that 

5. If I'm a cloned human, I don't want everyone to know that I'm a clone. If I am known to be a cloned human, I will be discriminated against.  (Lily)

→ Sophia answers even if there are two people, a real human and a clone human, it's okay because they are not distinguisghed by appearance.

6. My cloned human friends are good people. A clone is not a person who commits a crime. Why do you have such a negative image of clones?（John)

→ Kaitlyn answers some of them are good, but our country has bad human. They may commit a crime. We have to think in case.

7.  Eight years have passed since cloned humans existed in Apollon, but we have coexisted with them and have never heard of any crimes. And do they know they are clones? (Robert)

→ Erinn answers they don't know themselves as clone.

8.  If they have a microchip in their body, they can be distinguished by a metal detector, right? (Lily)

→ Kaitlyn answers that's fine in an emergency such as when a crime occurs. However, it is not realistic to use a metal detector in everyday life. So I want to make a new method.

9. What are your specific plan for a new role? Isn't it okay because they have microchips? Residents in 2013 should against you because you are discriminating against cloned humans. Is it okey? (Robert)

→ Kaitlyn answers that chips are just for their serial production number. We will make details after this.

 

Result

They can reach the consensus in their group, but they can't decide the details.

My Opinion

I don't understand their debate very well. I understand why I want to distinguish between cloned humans and real humans. But even though they were already living together, I don't know what the benefits were of distinguishing them. I feel that this debate itself discriminates against cloned humans. I also think members don't respond to what we want.